HomeMake a Payment / Customer Portal
About Us
Contact Us
People
Rules & By-Laws
Newsletters / CCRs
Water Meters
|
NEWSLETTER
- SUMMER
June 28, 2005 |
|
|
"To provide water service
that is depend- able, economical,
and meets or exceeds
health standards for all co-operative members”
I. President’s Corner
II. Water
System Improvements
III. Water
Allocation
IV. Chesapeake
Bay Restoration Fund
V. Annual
Water Quality Report and Consumer
Confidence Report
VI. Financial
LOCATION: 5901
Hillside Rd
MAIL: P.O.
Box 164
HOURS: 7:30
am – 4:00 pm
PHONE
410-586-8710 (ph)
410-586-1963
(fax)
WEB: beacheswater.com
EMAIL: apc@chesapeake.net
EMERGENCY: 410-231-1156
DROP BOX: Outside
Gate
Gary Clarke -
President
Bill Bozman – Vice
President
Sandy Anderson –
Secretary / Treasurer
Dan Crain - Director
Chris Pappas - Director
Fritz Riedel - Director
Dennis DiBello - Business
Manager &
Superintendent
Linda Speciale – Receptionist
Jackie Jacob – Bookkeeper
Kenny Grover – Operations
Tech.
Ray Foster - Maintenance
Tech.
|
I.
President’s Corner
John
Randall, a Director who had been on the Board almost as long as the
water
company has existed and a long time resident of Calvert Beach, passed
away this
spring. His 30 plus years as a Navy
Seabee gave him wide ranging knowledge of system maintenance and
repair, and we
will feel the loss of John’s expertise and input for years to
come. |
|
John Randall, Longtime BWC Board
Member John Alden Randall,
69, of St. Leonard died April 5, 2005, suddenly at his home due to
complications following surgery. Randall
was a retired Navy Master Chief who served with the Seabees for
31 years. He had three tours of duty in Antarctica, including helping
to build
the South Pole Station in 1957. John was one of eight men to first
build and
live at the South Pole Station. John also had tours of duty all over
the world,
including Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean, and ended his career with
NACFAC in
Alexandria, VA. After his retirement from the Navy in 1986, John worked
as
project manager at the Naval Research Laboratory in Chesapeake Beach. He is survived by his
wife, Christine Marie
Randall; son, Anthony and wife Cecilia; grandchildren, Brooke, Julia
and Sarah;
father-in-law, Loren Clarke; brother-in-law, Gary Clarke;
sister-in-law,
Beverly; sisters, Janice Maroney and Mary June Sorensen; brothers,
David,
Clarence, Lawrence and Harlan; and many devoted friends. Burial was at Arlington
National
Cemetery. Memorial
contributions may be
sent to the Seabee Memorial Scholarship Association (SMSA), PO Box
6574, Silver
Spring, MD 20916.
|
Joan
Humphreys who has been our
Secretary-Treasurer for many years is moving on. Joan has
been involved with the company for over 15 years, first
as our bookkeeper and the person who converted our accounting system
from 3 X 5
index cards to a computer to track billing and accounting.
Joan is also responsible for establishing
our present day financial records and office processes. Joan
is planning to move from the area to be
closer to her primary job, which will give her more time for her
avocation as
an artist. Look for her work in local
galleries. She captures our bay scene
memories on canvas. We thank Joan for
her many years of helping to develop the company we have today.
While
we, and most small water systems were not initially happy to become
“collection agents” for the State in the form of
payments
to the Bay Restoration Fund, it has proven to be a financially
transparent aspect of our business. The funds are sent
directly
to the State and we are able to recoup direct costs so that it does not
create a financial burden. We can only hope that those funds
are
distributed wisely to restore the Bay.
|
Water Quality
What
are contaminants in my
drinking water? Drinking water, including
bottled water, may reasonably be
expected to contain at least small amounts of some contaminants. The
presence
of contaminants does not necessarily indicate that water poses a health
risk.
More information about contaminants and potential health effects can be
obtained by calling the Environmental
Protection Agency's (EPA) Safe
Drinking Water Hotline (800-426-4791).
In order to ensure that tap
water is safe to drink, EPA prescribes
regulations that limit the amount of certain contaminants in water
provided by
public water systems. Food
and Drug
Administration (FDA) regulations establish limits for contaminants in
bottled
water which must provide the same protection for public health. |
..
Some
Water Quality
Terms Defined:
Action Level (AL)
- The concentration of a contaminant, which, if exceeded, triggers
treatment
or other requirements, which a water system must follow.
Non-Detects (ND)
- Laboratory analysis indicates that the constituent is not present.
Parts per million
(ppm) or Milligrams per liter (mg/l) -One part per million
corresponds
to one minute in two years or a single penny in $10,000.
Parts per billion
(ppb) or Micrograms per liter - One part per billion
corresponds
to one minute in 2,000 years, or a single penny in $10,000,000.
Treatment Technique
(TT) - A treatment technique is a required process intended
to
reduce the level of a contaminant in drinking water.
Maximum Contaminant
Level - The “Maximum Allowed” (MCL) is the highest level of a
contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. MCLs are set as
close
to the MCLGs as feasible using the best available treatment technology.
Maximum Contaminant
Level Goal - The “Goal”(MCLG) is the level of a contaminant
in
the drinking water table (shown below), which there is no known or
expected
risk to health. MCLGs allow for a margin of safety.
Maximum
Residual Disinfectant
Level
-
(MRDL) Maximum residual disinfectant level. The highest level of a
disinfectant
allowed in drinking water. There is convincing evidence that addition
of a
disinfectant is necessary for control of microbial contaminants
|
|
Advertising in BWC Billing
In 2002, Beaches Water Co-op began selling
advertisements to be included in our quarterly mail-out. We have received positive responses from
local businesses that have taken advantage of this opportunity. The income generated from the sale of
advertising space offsets the costs of the quarterly billing. |
Application/Transfer
Fee . $40.00
Quarterly
Service ............ $80.00
New
Service ............... $3,000.00
Pool (annual) ................. $80.00
Shut-off ......................
$80.00
($40.00
Customer’s Request)
Reconnect .................... $40.00
Extended
Shut-off ............ $320.00
Return
Check .............. $25.00
Late
Penalty One time 10% app- lied 15 days after end of quarter. |
|
Quarterly
Billing |
January
1 |
April
1 |
July
1 |
October
1 |
A 10% finance charge
is
assessed
10 days after
the
quarter for unpaid bills. |
|
|
You will
note in the budget that
a rate hike was necessary this year.
It
is important for our members to know that we spent a very long time
seeking
alternatives to avoid increased costs.
Several of our pump houses were
deteriorating and we have been working
on necessary repairs and remodeling.
Another major consideration this
year is our water allocation permits,
which we have spoken about before.
The
projected costs for this ongoing challenge are unknown at this point,
but we
set a budget allocation of $10,000 for associated costs, and we feel
that will
be a minimum. We
have been working on
this issue for a long while and hope that it will finally be resolved
this
year. These items
will be discussed
further in this newsletter.
You can do
your part helping to
maintain low costs by being aware that clean drinking water has become
a
precious commodity, and conserving accordingly.
If it becomes necessary to drill
new wells in this area, it is possible that those wells may have to be drilled into an aquifer, which
is
1600’ deep here, and it will be expensive to do so.
Please
attend our annual meeting
in September and let us know what you feel we can do to improve our
company in
coming years.
II.
Water System Improvements
In this past year, we
have focused on
maintaining and rebuilding our infrastructure.
With some parts of our system
dating back to the 1930’s and the system
evolving as needed over the years, we have many non-standard
configurations. We
continue our
systematic process of replacing in-ground pipe to eliminate the
“old” mains
while increasing system control and reliability.
This year we eliminated main
sections on Long Beach Road and Flag
Harbor Boulevard. Our
“piece meal”
approach allows us to work within a yearly budget without a major cost
expenditure. The
neediest sections (as
determined by past leaks or lack of isolation) get replaced first. We are also factoring in
considerations to
get pipe out from under the roadway to eliminate tearing up roads when
we have
to do work.
Our
building structures
were requiring roof replacements so we took the opportunity to improve
those
structures as well. We
replaced roofs
at the following pumping stations:
Slater, Jorgensen, and Rausch.
In addition, we made
improvements at Slater and Rausch by enclosing the
outside equipment. At
Slater we
enclosed the emergency generator and at Rausch we built a new structure
that
covers the old pump house as well as the below-grade pneumatic tank. |
|
|
We
continue
to improve the operation of the company in other ways as well. We are updating AUTOCAD
drawings of the
system piping. After
an extensive
review, we now have the “best guess” of what we
have for piping throughout the
system. |
III. Water Allocation
The
Maryland
Department of the Environment (MDE) permits water allocation to each
and every
user of water from the underground aquifers.
BWC’s permits have
expired. Our
water system, developed in the 1930’s, predates
MDE’s permitting of water
allocation. When
water allocation was
put in place, our allocation was based on the number of existing homes
in the
community and not the number of homes that would be built as is done
with new
subdivisions today. Back
then the number
used to calculate our allocation may have been a little less than 400
homes. We now are
close to 800 homes
and near the end of our potential build out.
Community water allocation is
calculated on a per household basis.
We have been negotiating with MDE
to
determine exactly what needs to be done to increase our allocation. We have contended that we
are not a new user
and our original allocation was incorrectly calculated based on the
number of
existing homes and not on our build out.
This then should allow an
administrative paper work change.
MDE does not have any aquifer
performance
data for our area and therefore would like us to do engineering and
hydro
geological tests to demonstrate aquifer draw down and replenishment. Unfortunately, this can be
at the costs of
over $10,000.00 to prove that the aquifers can meet our daily needs, in
which
they already do. No
matter the outcome
of this situation, in the coming months, we will be hosting public
hearings to
discuss renewing our water allocation permits.
We have been extremely
conservative in our water management and that has
allowed the number of homes to rise to our build-out under the existing
allocation. In
these public hearings,
we will present our needs and request the allocation that should have
been
originally established for us. We
look
forward to your support in this matter.
IV. Chesapeake Bay Restoration Fund (BRF)
Effective
January 1, 2005, Beaches Water Co-op began collecting $7.50 per
quarter for the State of Maryland from each
customer as required by the BRF legislation. In
2004, the Maryland State Legislature passed
Senate Bill-320 to establish the Bay Restoration Fund.
The purpose of this fund is to
improve the
environment and water quality of the Chesapeake Bay.
This fund will be used to upgrade
wastewater treatment plants and
septic systems in the critical area and implement cover crop on
agricultural
land through an environmental surcharge fee.
Since the BRF does not just apply
to those on water and sewer systems,
starting October 1, 2005, Maryland County governments will collect
$30.00 per
year from households on private wells or septic systems. Additional information is
available at www.mde.state.md.us/water/cbwrf/index.asp
|
Arsenic and Drinking Water
Dr. Gerhardt Riedel
In
Jan. 2001, the EPA reduced the Maximum Concentration Limit (MCL) for
arsenic in
drinking water from 50 to 10 parts per billion (ppb), with enforcement
of this
standard to start in January 2006. (1).
This followed several years
of study and review, which showed that
higher concentrations (100-500 ppb) of arsenic in drinking water caused
sickness, including a variety of cancers.
The new MCL was chosen to
balance the chance of illness with the costs
and difficulty and expense of treating drinking water to remove arsenic. The lifetime risk of a
fatal cancer
associated with drinking water at 10 ppb arsenic is estimated to be
0.2%
(2). The predominant cancers
associated
with arsenic are those of lung, bladder and skin. To put that number in
perspective, overall cancer death rates in the United State are
approximately
23%, the second leading cause of death (3).
It is estimated that
approximately 5% of the United States water systems
will exceed the new standard, and will have to take some steps to
reduce
arsenic levels.
Arsenic
is a natural constituent in water, found in rain water, surface waters,
seawater,
and ground waters. Concentrations
in
the groundwater are of the most concern to us, since the drinking water
for our
community comes from wells. In
Southern
Maryland, drinking water is taken from a variety of aquifers, primarily
the
Nanjemoy, the Aquia, and the Patapsco, which occur at different depths. The wells of the Beaches
Water system are in
the Nanjemoy and Aquia aquifers. These aquifers are known to contain
somewhat
elevated levels of arsenic, between 1-15 ppb, due to the types of
minerals present
in the aquifers. The
wells in the
Beaches Water system have been monitored for arsenic for several years
as part
of the state mandated water testing, and concentrations ranging from 3
to just
over 10 ppb have been observed.
Water
from the Beaches Water system is the blended result from several wells,
so
concentrations in the water supply reflect the mixture of those wells,
which is
always less than the new 10 ppb standard.
However, we are monitoring
the situation, and looking at ways to
minimize the concentration of arsenic in our water supply, within our
ability
to do so. Our first
response was to
change the priority of the use of wells on our system, so that two
wells (of
eight total) which have been observed to produce water with arsenic
above the
10 ppb standard are used only when all other wells are at maximum use,
guaranteeing that they are diluted below the standard.
However, concentration of
arsenic in our
wells is not well known (we have only a few measurements over several
years),
and we are unsure whether the concentrations are constant in a
particular well
with time. We are
collecting samples in
order to check this.
In
the event that further measures to lower the
arsenic concentrations of our water supply are necessary, we have a few
options. First
would be to take the
wells with the highest arsenic concentrations off line.
Our
system has sufficient redundancy in wells that, except under the most
extreme
water demand periods, we could provide an adequate water supply with
the six
remaining wells. Second,
we could drill
new wells. This is
a very expensive
proposition. New
wells in the Nanjemoy
or Aquia aquifer would potentially have similar concentrations to those
we
already have. To
reach an aquifer with
low arsenic concentrations would require drilling approximately 1500 ft
to the
Patapsco aquifer, which would cost approximately $100,000. Finally, water could be
treated to remove
arsenic. Treatment
to remove arsenic is
difficult on a water system that provides the volume of water that ours
does
(several million gallons per month on average).
Currently, very few
community water systems have the ability to
lower concentrations of arsenic because of its difficulty and expense. However, as this standard
is adopted, some
treatment systems might be adopted by community systems, and become
more
readily available.
What
can you do about arsenic in the water supply?
Bottled water only has to
meet the same standards that Beaches Water
system must, so switching to bottled water provides no assurance of
lower
arsenic concentrations, unless an analysis is presented on the bottle.
If you
are concerned over the concentration of arsenic in your drinking water
you
could consider point-of-use treatment systems (4).
These can reduce the levels
of arsenic in your drinking water
further, and only treats water that is being used for consumption (e.g.
not
irrigation, laundry and sanitary uses, which form the bulk of our water
use).
|
Service
Advisory
-- We will be flushing
community fire hydrants the
week of July 13-17 starting at 9:00 am This may cause the water
to be discolored due to disturbing the sediment and deposits in
the pipes. This
sediment is naturally
occurring minerals in the water. Discolored
water poses no health hazard. It is free from harmful
bacteria and safe for all household uses, such as showering, cooking,
flushing
of toilets, etc. You can drink the discolored water, but it may taste
different. However, you should NOT wash
clothes in your washing
machine if the water is discolored as clothing may stain. Flush you water
lines though an outside
hose bib to clear up the discoloration.
|
|
V. Annual Water
Quality & Consumer Confidence Report
.
Our
drinking water is safe and meets all federal and state requirements for
community drinking water. In
2004,
there were no water quality violations. Our water
quality results are based on the monitoring cycle for the contaminant
up
to December 31st, 2004. Terminology used in this
report
is what is generally accepted as a means of measurement of the degree
of
contaminates in the water. Contaminates
include natural occurring items in the water such as minerals and
foreign
matter which may or may not be acceptable based on the level detected. The amount of containments in our
drinking
water is well below levels set by the Environmental Protection Agency
in all
categories. We
routinely monitor for contaminates in your drinking water according to Federal and State laws. All drinking water,
including bottled
drinking water, may be reasonably expected to contain at least small
amounts of
some contaminates.
It's important to
remember that the presence of these contaminates does not necessarily
pose a
health risk. If you
have any questions
about the Annual Water Quality Report or concerning your water service,
please
contact us at 410-586-8710.-
Microbial Results
|
MCLG
|
MCL
|
Level
Detected
|
Violation
|
Likely Source of Contamination
|
Total
Coliform Bacteria
|
0
|
> 5%
samples
|
0
|
NO
|
Naturally present in
the environment
|
Di (2-ethylhexyl)
phthalate (ppb)
|
0
|
6.0
|
5.0
|
NO
|
Discharge from rubber
and chemical factories
|
Arsenic
(ppb)
|
1.0
|
10
|
7.0
|
NO
|
Natural
deposits
|
Copper (mg/l)
|
1.3
|
|
0.12
|
NO
|
Natural
deposits; corrosion of household piping
|
Iron - (mg/l)
|
--
|
--
|
0.14
|
NO
|
Natural
deposits
|
Fluoride
- (mg/l)
|
4.0
|
4.0
|
0.32
|
NO
|
Erosion
of natural deposits; Leaching
|
Sodium
- (mg/l)
|
--
|
--
|
9.96
|
NO
|
Erosion
of natural deposits; Leaching
|
Total
Trihalomethanes (mg/l)
|
n/a
|
0.80
|
0.002
|
NO
|
By-product
of drinking water disinfection
|
Gross
Alpha (pCi/l)
|
0
|
15
|
1.0
|
NO
|
Erosion
of natural deposits
|
Gross
Beta (pCi/l)
|
0
|
50
|
17
|
NO
|
Erosion
of natural deposits
|
Maryland
Department of the Environment (MDE) has completed a Source Water
Assessment of
the Beaches Water Company wells in the Nanjamoy and Aquia aquifers. This report is available
in the office for
public review.
Some people may be
more vulnerable to contaminants in drinking water than the general
population.
Immuno-compromised persons such as persons with cancer undergoing
chemotherapy,
persons who have undergone organ transplants, people with HIV/AIDS or
other
immune system disorders, some elderly, and infants can be particularly
at risk from infections. These people should seek advice about drinking
water from their health care providers. EPA/Centers
for Disease Control
(CDC)
guidelines on appropriate
means to lessen the risk of infection by Cryptosporidium and other
microbiological
contaminants are available from the Safe Drinking Water Hotline
(800-426-4791).
VI.
Financial
Although
we have been able to defray certain
costs; increases in other operating costs and capital expenditures
(maintaining
and upgrading our system) have made it necessary for us to increase our
fees. The Schedule
of Fees below
reflects the fiscal year budget for 2006, (7/1/05– 6/30/06)
and includes a
$5.00 increase in our rates
BWC FY 2006
BUDGET
|
INCOME
|
Water service
|
250,560.00
|
Pool water
service
|
2,640.00
|
Space Rental
|
1,200.00
|
Advertising-Quarterly
|
3,600.00
|
Application
& Transfer Fees
|
2,560.00
|
Hook ups
|
12,000.00
|
Total Income
|
$272,560.00
|
BWC FY 2006 BUDGET
|
EXPENSES
|
Auditing
|
4,500.00
|
Bad Debt
|
210.00
|
Bank Service
Charges
|
210.00
|
Contributions
|
210.00
|
Depreciation
Expense
|
51,591.00
|
Professional
Memberships
|
420.00
|
Engineering
|
525.00
|
Insurance
|
10,500.00
|
Loan Interest
|
200.00
|
Mortgage
Interest - GMAC
|
1,340.00
|
Mortgage Pay
Down - GMAC
|
16,690.00
|
Mortgage
Interest - MDE
|
1,890.00
|
Legal
|
368.00
|
Licenses and
Permits
|
210.00
|
Office - Other
|
4,158.00
|
Operating
Supplies
|
8,925.00
|
Repairs
& Maintenance
|
10,500.00
|
Routine
Service
|
131,905.00
|
Solid Waste Fee
|
108.00
|
Utilities
|
21,000.00
|
Water Testing
|
2,100.00
|
|
5,000.00
|
Total Expense
|
$272,560.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please submit all questions and comments
to
beacheswater5901@gmail.com
|